Community//

How to Measure Education Equity

Equity in learning can be very difficult to handle, as it is an inherently political issue. Equity requires we look at the goals sought by the population, and provide to each according to their need – unlike equality, which provides the same to all. The difficulty in providing an equitable education is that by identifying […]

The Thrive Global Community welcomes voices from many spheres. We publish pieces written by outside contributors with a wide range of opinions, which don’t necessarily reflect our own. Community stories are not commissioned by our editorial team, and though they are reviewed for adherence to our guidelines, they are submitted in their final form to our open platform. Learn more or join us as a community member!
How to Measure Education Equity
Ways to examine educational data in order to better understand how The equity of your educational system

Equity in learning can be very difficult to handle, as it is an inherently political issue. Equity requires we look at the goals sought by the population, and provide to each according to their need – unlike equality, which provides the same to all.

The difficulty in providing an equitable education is that by identifying which segments of the population are disadvantaged and require more, you also identify the ones that have an advantage. The privileged often feel as though their achievements and struggles are disregarded or overlooked when these advantages are pointed out. 

But the numbers are clear. In many countries, only 1 in 4 lower-income children will complete primary education, versus 3 in 4 higher-income children.

The Handbook

The Handbook on Measuring Equity in Education produced by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, FHI 360 Education Policy Data Centre, Oxford Policy Management, and the Research for Equitable Access and Learning (REAL) Centre at the University of Cambridge.

The Handbook seeks to provide practical guidance on the calculation and interpretation of indicators designed to target the most disadvantaged groups.

The Criteria

1. Meritocracy

Many education systems apply a meritocratic approach when it comes to distributing educational opportunities. The child with the best test scores gets to the best college. However, in practice, this is fraught with controversy. Does the merit measure (e.g. test scores) correlate with wealth too consistently? With gender? For a properly meritocratic system, the goal should be to push for only the merit measure to be correlated with the outcome goal (e.g graduation, college admissions, etc.

2. Minimum Standards

Somewhat in opposition to the meritocracy is a minimum standard, in which a basic level of achievement (E.g. Literacy, highschool graduation, etc.) is sought after for all students. This is perhaps the simplest way of thinking about equity, as the goal is simply to ensure a 100% attainment of the goal. The United Nations Millenium Goals included universal primary education as a minimum standard for developing and developed nations.

3. Impartiality

Equality of opportunity is a common concept in political and philosophical realms, and usually refers to ensuring the outcome of a person’s situation is purely connected to what they can control. However, it is difficult to hold a child responsible for their own talents or motivations in the same way we would with an adult, who has more agency. So educationally speaking, Impartiality is the term more often used.

Some of the more commonly used impartiality measures include race, gender, and income.

4. Equality of condition

Where impartiality is focused on how a variable (such as test scores) correlates with circumstances (like race), equality of condition looks at how that variable is distributed among the entire population. This is is often the way that economic inequality is examined: If everyone had the same net worth, then a graph of worth and population would form a flat line as they correlate cleanly. This is useful for more universal or generic inputs, like years of education, public expenditure, or time spent on education outside of the institution. 

5. Redistribution

To equalize educational outcomes, many governments decide to distribute educational resources unequally. Providing lower-performing or disadvantaged institutions resources to compete with more privileged ones. Monitoring the success of this redistribution is very useful for understanding how well inputs compensate for disadvantages – how well does expenditure compensate for a region’s high poverty rates, for example. This can be complicated by what factors you are putting against expenditure – a population with more learning disabilities or ESL students may merit higher education expenditure, but race and gender will not. 

Content originally published to jeffhorton.info

Share your comments below. Please read our commenting guidelines before posting. If you have a concern about a comment, report it here.

You might also like...

Community//

“How to improve the educational system.” With Penny Bauder & Dr. Lillian Lowery

by Penny Bauder, Founder of Green Kid Crafts
Community//

The Future of Healthcare With Dr. Paul J. Chung of the Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine

by Christina D. Warner, MBA
ND3000/ Shutterstock
Wisdom//

Together, Let’s Move Toward More Equitable and Inclusive Workplaces

by Karyn Twaronite

Sign up for the Thrive Global newsletter

Will be used in accordance with our privacy policy.

Thrive Global
People look for retreats for themselves, in the country, by the coast, or in the hills . . . There is nowhere that a person can find a more peaceful and trouble-free retreat than in his own mind. . . . So constantly give yourself this retreat, and renew yourself.

- MARCUS AURELIUS

We use cookies on our site to give you the best experience possible. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to this use. For more information on how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy.