Community//

“Return to work” makes no sense. Here’s why.

"Return to work" implies people have not been working. They have. A lot.

The Thrive Global Community welcomes voices from many spheres on our open platform. We publish pieces as written by outside contributors with a wide range of opinions, which don’t necessarily reflect our own. Community stories are not commissioned by our editorial team and must meet our guidelines prior to being published.
return to work

Recent research conducted by Jennifer Moss, Michael Leiter, Christina Maslach, and David Whiteside, in association with Harvard Business Review, found that global burnout is a problem. The majority of respondents (85%) reported a decline in well-being with only 21% of respondents rating their well-being as “good,” and a mere 2% rating it as “excellent.” 

If we look at how work has changed since the start of the pandemic, these results are unsurprising.

The average workday is now 10.75 hours – 48.5 minutes longer than it was pre-pandemic. At the same time, job demands have increased, as has time in meetings and time connected with colleagues via channels such as Slack and Teams

If we have learned anything over this past year, it is that work is a verb and not a place. 

With President Biden’s announcement that 90% of adults will be eligible to get a COVID-19 vaccination by April 19, 2021, leaders are wrestling with when and if they should bring people back to the office

For those who plan to bring their workforce back to the office, it is critical to frame the future as just that – a return to the office, not a return to work. People have been working – a lot.

This shift in mindset from “return to work” to “return to the office” is critical. It not only acknowledges that people have been working, but it also sets expectations and establishes guardrails around the first days, weeks, and even months of bringing people back into the office.

Leaders need to place focus on re-connecting with people, giving people opportunities to re-connect with others, establishing a new cadence of work, and prioritizing well-being. Leading with empathy and compassion and giving people the opportunity to step away from “survival mode” and feeling of always needing to be on is not just “nice,” it is common sense.

Research shows that an engaged employee is 45% more productive than a merely satisfied worker. And an inspired employee — one who has a profound personal connection to their work and/or their company ― is 55% more productive than an engaged employee or more than twice as productive as a satisfied worker. 

When employees are burned out and don’t feel that their work is valued, they are not engaged and not inspired. The better an organization is engaging and inspiring its employees, the better its performance. 

Whether you plan to adopt a hybrid model or plan to bring your workforce fully back into the office, don’t announce a “return to work,” that is a slap in the face. People have been working more, working harder, and navigating simultaneous health, economic, and social crises – while at the same time caring for children and sick family members, dealing with isolation, and facing uncertainty. 

Remember, work is a verb, not a place. 

    Share your comments below. Please read our commenting guidelines before posting. If you have a concern about a comment, report it here.

    You might also like...

    return to work
    Community//

    “Return to work” makes no sense. Here’s why.

    by Kate Lee
    return to work
    Community//

    “Return to work” makes no sense. Here’s why.

    by Kate Lee
    Community//

    The state of our relationships in the COVID-19 era and beyond

    by Lesley Eccles
    We use cookies on our site to give you the best experience possible. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to this use. For more information on how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy.