Community//

Leo Radvinsky On Reinventing Your Social Media Connection

Social media provides a platform to share thoughts and to engage with family and friends separated by distance, but users are finding themselves needing to balance the benefits of social media and its potentially negative impacts on their mental health. Some users are reinventing their relationship with social media through the use of decentralized social […]

The Thrive Global Community welcomes voices from many spheres on our open platform. We publish pieces as written by outside contributors with a wide range of opinions, which don’t necessarily reflect our own. Community stories are not commissioned by our editorial team and must meet our guidelines prior to being published.
Leo Radvinsky

Social media provides a platform to share thoughts and to engage with family and friends separated by distance, but users are finding themselves needing to balance the benefits of social media and its potentially negative impacts on their mental health. Some users are reinventing their relationship with social media through the use of decentralized social networks like Pleroma. 

Decentralized platforms like Pleroma provide users with the ability to control the content that they consume.  This ability for users to moderate their own communities may alleviate some of the negative impacts of social media on mental health. Tech entrepreneurs like Leonid Radvinsky are paving the way for this new state of social media through his investment and vision for Pleroma.

Mental Health and Social Media

From controversies surrounding fake news to algorithm shifts that show fewer friends’ content, social media is often a place of anxiety and frustration. The platforms often require an “always on” approach that provides funny (but not offensive) and picturesque (but not staged) content. It’s exhausting and undermines mental health in a number of ways. Social media users often experience increased:

  • FOMO (fear of missing out).
  • Depression
  • Anxiety.
  • Vulnerability.
  • Distraction.
  • Privacy invasion.

Despite that, social media is like a drug, pulling users back for one more hit of the engagement that they crave from others. Studies show that teens are more depressed and anxious when they increase their screen time, especially when that time is spent on social media use. Social media use has also been linked to poor sleep quality, low self-esteem, and increased anxiety.

As people are using the platforms, however, they often don’t feel the negative impact. Algorithms on these platforms work hard to show the content that keeps people hooked, calculating the content that users slow down to read and then curating their feed to include more of it. The posts that make your blood boil and your friend’s adorable new kitten are bothworking to keep you hooked.

Money Trails and Centralized Social Media Bias

Much of the pressure to keep users on social media comes from the reliance of platforms on paying sponsors. Social media platforms make money from the billions of users looking at and clicking on sponsored ads. Because of their reliance on advertising revenue, most social media platforms are incentivized to keep users interacting with their content regardless of its impact on mental health. This focus on maximizing the amount of time users spend on the platform interferes with the ability of users to moderate the content they consume.”

How Decentralized Social Networks Work

As these social media platforms focus on benefits on keeping their sponsors happy, they aren’t necessarily prioritizing the mental well-being of their users. Decentralized networks allow users to moderate their own communities outside of the control of a centralized platform.

Rather than relying on a centralized platform, decentralized networks are composed of independently run servers. This structure provides users with more autonomy to moderate their own content. Each server within the Fediverse is self-governing.

What Is the Fediverse?

The Fediverse is made up of user-hosted instances across decentralized social media platforms. Each instance is its own individual community with the ability to communicate with other, interconnected servers. Unlike centralized social media platforms, federated networks can interact with other networks in the Fediverse. The Federation’s growing collection of instances just surpassed more than four million users total and contains more than 446 million posts.

Instances can moderate the content that appears on their own server without relying on centralized platforms to make good faith efforts toward harm reduction. They can also block other instances that spread harmful content and disinformation from interacting with their instance. Moderation becomes an act of social pressure rather than depending on what is monetarily beneficial to a platform.

Pursuing the Decentralized Platform

Leonid Radvinsky has been a believer in decentralized social networks for years. In 2018, he invested $3 million into developing the free social platform, Pleroma, with the goal of creating a lighter and more simplified platform than some of the current decentralized options.

The Pleroma server is compatible with Mastodon, GNU Social, and ActivityPub servers. This free platform is a microblogging server with a default maximum of 5,000 characters. Servers within Pleroma can set their own restrictions to any value. Like most social media platforms, Pleroma allows you to like, repeat, and reply to posts. The Public Timeline shows posts made on the server, while the Whole Known Network shows all local posts, along with posts from other servers in the Fediverse. Each user also has a main timeline that contains content from the people they’ve chosen to follow and a real-time chat feature for users of that instance.

Pleroma has very few rules in its TOS, and they are written in plain language for all users to understand. Users must tag adult-only/sensitive content and cannot use the platform for doxing, distributing malware, or mass-advertising content.

Improving User Experience

The expectations toward social media are starting to shift as people realize how these platforms mine and use their data. The Netflix documentary-drama “The Social Dilemma” showed a fairly in-depth conversation about how invasive and abusive social media has become in the interest of business.

People are starting to leave social media. It is a slow trickle, but the numbers dropped for the first time in 2018 since the start of the trend. There are a number of reasons behind this shift, including:

  • Free speech and censorship resistance.
  • Private data protection.
  • Invasive advertising.
  • Stress and anxiety.
  • Time management.

There are some major advantages to shifting away from centralized social media and increasing the popularity of decentralized social media platforms:

Protecting Users From Abuse

Investors like Leo Radvinsky see multiple threats to users of centralized social media.. Because users are the product of these platforms, they risk their information being sold to advertisers. Additionally, they are susceptible to governments accessing their personal information. Authorities globally have been cracking down on users who share political messages, but with decentralized social media, actions and messages don’t need to be tied to a person. Decentralized networks improve user experience by increasing transparency on the user end and trust in the Fediverse.

Reducing Fake Activity

Current centralized social media platforms are notorious for using algorithms that reward high engagement. These algorithms make it difficult for users with smaller followings to grow their audience since their content is frequently hidden from users. To combat these algorithms, some accounts have started paying for bot “likes,” shares, or followers. Decentralized social media can use fairer algorithms to display content and can verify influencer audiences using smart contracts, eliminating the value of bot accounts.

Through social networks like Pleroma, the control of content goes back to the users. With more control over the content they see and less manipulation by the platform they use, users will find social media a more valuable experience. For the good of everyone’s mental health, social media needs to change.

About Leonid Radvinsky

Leo Radvinsky is a venture capital fund investor, entrepreneur, and e-commerce pioneer. He has invested in Pleroma and B4X.com (a free open-source software language tool that’s ideal for beginners). At Leo.com, he invests in technology companies as a boutique venture capital fund. He majored in economics at Northwestern University. Leo Radvinsky wants to be part of lean startups dedicated to innovative solutions for next-generation internet applications. He has a visionary perspective on technology and supports the growth of decentralized social media networks.

    Share your comments below. Please read our commenting guidelines before posting. If you have a concern about a comment, report it here.

    You might also like...

    Nicholas Duro
    Community//

    Good Media, Bad Media: How Healthy is your Social Network? Influencer Nicholas Duro is Disrupting His Industry With Private Island

    by Joey Claudio
    Social Media Alternatives
    Community//

    The Cure for the Social Dilemma Could Already be Here

    by Chantel Soumis
    Photo by NordWood Themes on Unsplash
    Community//

    Digitally Disconnected: When Social Media Doesn’t Feel Social

    by Thomas G. Bognanno

    Sign up for the Thrive Global newsletter

    Will be used in accordance with our privacy policy.

    Thrive Global
    People look for retreats for themselves, in the country, by the coast, or in the hills . . . There is nowhere that a person can find a more peaceful and trouble-free retreat than in his own mind. . . . So constantly give yourself this retreat, and renew yourself.

    - MARCUS AURELIUS

    We use cookies on our site to give you the best experience possible. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to this use. For more information on how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy.