We’ve all experienced communication breakdowns.
You know the feeling. One minute you’re having a normal conversation with someone, and then, before you know it, one of you is triggered and the conversation is over. The conversation either ends in anger, hurt feelings or conflict, or it “withers away” because one of you has withdrawn or shut down.
In both cases, there’s a breakdown. The conversation has failed to achieve its goal, whether it’s being heard, solving a problem, feeling connected, making a decision, etc.
This happens all the time. It takes seconds for a conversation to shift from a positive, connection-driven interaction into a negative one.
And negative interactions take a toll on our relationships. Studies show that we need 5 positive interactions to make up for every negative interaction we have with someone close to us.
So why does this happen?
According to Transactional Analysis, we experience communication breakdown because we’re not fully present in our conversations. Instead of reacting to the here and now, we’re communicating from different ‘ego states’. And when these ego states are crossed, conflict happens.
This article will teach you how to use Transactional Analysis to have better, more constructive conversations (and interactions, in general) with the people closest to you.
Part 1 will introduce Transactional Analysis, the different ego states, and common transactions. Part 2 will focus on the ‘games we play’ and how to change them.
Transactional Analysis (TA) is a psychological theory, developed by Eric Berne in the 1960s, that helps explain why we think, act and feel the way we do.
TA claims that we can better understand ourselves by analyzing our transactions with the people closest to us. Transaction = conversation/interaction between two people.
TA is most effective for understanding: 1) transactions with people you’re close to, not colleagues or acquaintances and 2) transactions about sensitive, important topics such as sex, money, jealousy…pretty much anything that’s triggering, i.e. causes a deep-rooted emotional reaction in you or the other person.
TA is based on 3 principles:
Basically, transactional analysis is about identifying which ego states are present in your transactions so that you can become more conscious of your thoughts and behaviors, and ultimately have better, more constructive transactions with the people closest to you.
We all have all three ego states: Parent, Adult, and Child. These ego states are made up of consistent feelings and behaviors. *Ego states aren’t always negative, see below.
These ego states are being activated all the time, whether we’re aware of it or not:
Parent (rooted in the past) — Contains the attitudes, feelings, and behavior incorporated from our parents (or any primary caregiver). It involves responding as one of our parents would have: saying what they would have said, feeling what they would have felt, behaving how they would have behaved.
Adult (rooted in the present)– Our ability to think and act based on what’s happening in the here and now. Think of transactions you have with colleagues or acquaintances. These are usually pretty straightforward, without a lot of emotional triggers.
Child (rooted in the past) — Contains the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that we experienced as a child.
IMPORTANT: The adaptive child is one of the most troublesome parts of our personality. It developed as we learned to change (adapt) our feelings and behavior in response to the world around us.
According to TA, our 3 ego states ‘show up’ whether we want them to or not, so it’s important to be aware of what they ‘look’ like.
The good news is that this is pretty easy to do. Simply think back and answer the following questions:
This is what Tony Robbins is getting at when he asks: “Think of the person whose love you craved most: what did you have to be for that person to accept and love you? What did you have to think or do to gain their approval?”
Now pay attention to which elements of your Child and Parent ego states you’ve integrated into your thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors.
Every person’s Parent and Child ego states are different.
For example, when my Child ego state is activated I shut down and can’t talk to anybody. Other people’s Child may get defensive or lash out. It all depends on the patterns you picked up as a child.
Now, think about the people closest to you. What does your partner’s ‘Child’ ego state look like? What about their Parent?
Now let’s examine how these ego states can be activated in different transactions.
According to TA, there are three kinds of transactions: Complementary, Crossed & Ulterior. Part 1 will only focus on Complementary and Crossed transactions. Part 2 will focus on Ulterior transactions.
Complementary transactions = effective and successful communication.
Complementary transactions are when two people’s ego states are sympathetic or complementary to one another.
For example, if the request is from Person 1 (Adult) to Person 2 (Child), then the response must be from Person 2 (Child) to Person 1 (Adult). Examples include Parent-Child and Adult-Adult.
Example 1: Adult — Adult
Money is a trigger topic (at least in my experience) because it’s uncomfortable, stressful and emotional to talk about.
A complementary transaction around money would like this:
In this transaction, all is good:
*I’m assuming that Person 1’s question is fueled by curiosity, thus coming from the Adult ego state. However, it could be that Person 1’s question is actually fueled by a desire to blame or prove a point. In this case, Person 1’s ‘Parent’ ego state is probably being activated, not the Adult.
Either way, the point of transactional analysis is to pay attention to your conversations with the people closest to you. To bring awareness to what roles (ego states) you’re both activating and why.
Example #2: Parent-Child
Another complementary transaction is Parent -> Child. This can occur when one person is sick © and wants to be taken care of by the other person (P).
How do you know you’re having a complementary transaction?
Crossed transactions happen when Person 1 says something from one ego state and receives a different response than he/she is expecting.
For example: Back to the money topic.
In this transaction, all is NOT good:
Another example is:
According to TA, all communication breakdowns occur because of a crossed transaction.
When you’re in the middle of a crossed transaction, the only way to get it back to a constructive place is for one, or both of you, to shift ego states.
Usually, it’s best to shift (or try very very hard to shift) to the Adult ego state. However, in the Child-Parent crossed transaction, it would probably be best for Person 2 to shift to Parent.
Now that you know what’s up, it’s time to use this knowledge to your advantage.
Remember, the goal is to have better, more constructive conversations with the people closest to you.
So when a friend calls you crying, think about which ego state they’re in, and which one they want a response from. Do they want support from the nurturing Parent or advice from the Adult?
Sometimes it’s hard to know what people want. So a good friend gave me a great tip — just ask.
Next time a friend calls you with a problem, just ask ‘do you need advice? Or love and support?’ This way you can manage which ego state is being activated.
You can also use TA to become more aware of your relationship’s communication patterns. For example, it can help you realize if you’re stuck in a Parent-Child transaction.
In Part 2 I’ll explore Ulterior transactions — these are the transactions that lead to Games, and a lot of confusion, miscommunication, conflict, etc. in our lives.
I started a monthly(ish) newsletter where I share more thoughts/ideas plus meaningful bits and pieces from the web. If you’re interested in receiving it, you can subscribe here.
Thanks so much for reading!