Fewer Women Are Authoring Invited Commentaries in Scientific Journals, Study Finds

The study examined gender differences in over 2,400 published scientific journals.

Thrive invites voices from many spheres to share their perspectives on our Community platform. Community stories are not commissioned by our editorial team, and opinions expressed by Community contributors do not reflect the opinions of Thrive or its employees. More information on our Community guidelines is available here.

For women in the workplace, whether it be in medicine, science or global health, a growing majority still regard gender equity as a concern. This includes even those involved with probing and bringing such issues to light, as highlighted in a new Harvard study.

In the study, published in JAMA Network Open, it was determined that women authors are less likely than men to participate in invited commentaries in scientific journals.

The study, conducted by a team of researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, began by thoroughly examining invited commentaries in 2,459 English-based medical journals published between January 2013 and December 2017.

“This matched case-control study included all medical invited commentaries published from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2017, in English-language medical journals and multidisciplinary journals,” wrote Emma Thomas, the study’s co-author.

“Invited commentaries were defined as publications that cite another publication within the same journal volume and issue. Bibliometric data were obtained from Scopus. Cases were defined as corresponding authors of invited commentaries in a given journal during the study period.”

The Results

According to the findings, researchers discovered that the odds of invited commentary for women authors were 21 percent lower compared to men with a similar scientific background.

“In this case-control study of invited commentaries published in 2459 journals from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2017, the odds of authoring an invited commentary were 21% lower for women compared with men who had similar fields of expertise and publication metrics among researchers who had been actively publishing for the median of 19 years,” the findings state.

Additionally, the gender gap was wider among senior researchers, the team concluded.

“This result challenges the common assumption that gender disparities in invited article authorship can be explained by greater publication success, seniority, or self-selection into competitive fields among male scientists.”

“For future research, journals could keep records of invitations to establish whether there are gender differences in acceptance rates.”

This article originally appeared on Mental Daily.

You might also like...

AleksandarNakic/ Getty Images

If You’re a Hard-Working Woman, Those Overtime Hours Might Be Jeopardizing Your Health


Rebel Wilson : Lessons on Leveraging Your Personal Brand at Super Bowl

by Rachel Quilty
Work Smarter//

Leaning In Might Not Be Enough, According to New Research

by The Ladders
We use cookies on our site to give you the best experience possible. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to this use. For more information on how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy.