Imagine this scenario: You volunteer yourself for an experiment in which you would marry someone who you’ve never met with the hope that the relationship professionals that have put both of you together has managed to keep in mind the essential information to make sure you’ve got the right match.
A miracle happens and the person you were matched with, is amazing. As expected, you both go through a period of understanding each other and seeing areas where each of you could grow as a person. It’s stressful and frustrations jab you seemingly at every turn (just when you think you’ve got a handle on things), and you get another miracle…somehow after all that…you both are still in it.
Then another participant in the experiment seems hell-bent in creating drama, you get pulled into it a few times but managed to steer clear of it (even if it would be so satisfying to prove that you didn’t even say whatever she was accusing her of). This time you’re not having any of it, as she is now causing issues with another participant (lets call him ‘Jim’) because she is trying to hide something (she wants to stay in the experiment to spend time with the other spouses).
But see…you don’t know that. But you only know of what you see: a person with no regard to consequences. It’s not a 15-year-old your dealing with here….but someone who is seemingly just stepping out of adolescence at 28 (you’re not looking to be ageist….and focusing instead of the behaviour of this person).
Because you have come to care about Jim
Now that scenario I painted is quite similar to what happened during episode 32 of ‘Married At First Sight’. As someone who has a similar sense of justice as Mike, it would be good to have Jessika kept accountable on what she’s been saying.
One thing that surprised me the most was the comment John made:
“This is what happens with Mike when he doesn’t get his way, he gets personal.”
As well as Trisha:
“He goes hard on Jess, and easy on the issue.”
As an observer, it seems like the relationship specialists are ignoring Jessika’s behaviour. But then I should remind myself that unlike the viewers, they have a narrow view of what’s going on. They have no idea of the deceptions that have been going on from both Dan and Jessika as they keep the other participants learning that they have met privately and discussed something before they finalise things with their partners.
Maybe they also see an angle that viewers don’t see about Mike, and an area that he could work on that is a ticking bomb with his relationship with Heidi (as she clearly wasn’t happy about his continuous jabs towards Jessika). Though there is a nobility in making sure someone is held responsible for their actions (so at the least that person would think about their actions — hopefully! — in the future).
On the subject on being personal…well…to me it makes sense that he would bring up what Jessika did to him (I am also hoping that they would air the clip on what really happened — did Mike really say something close to: ‘That’s so fake’?). Based on the information, it seems that Jessika is doing the same thing (‘stirring the pot’ just for kicks) she did to him. It didn’t seem that Mike crossed the line, as he was addressing Jessika’s behaviour (regularly posing on Instagram) rather than a personal attack (‘You’re a horrible person’).
It’s not until much later that that other piece (which Mike is blind to) is revealed by Heidi: it’s clear that Jessika isn’t wanting Mike’s counsel. Not only that, it’s clear that Jessika doesn’t want to change her ways (constantly being drawn into drama).
Heidi: Some people don’t want advice. Some people just want to talk. They don’t—You know what I mean?
This truth is difficult to swallow sometimes. That there are people who’ll just go forward with their destructive ways and it doesn’t matter how many well meaning people try to intervene. Change would only happen if the person is ready. And it’s our job (or at least our group keen on personal development…and open to help others through it) to constantly be alert on which way to act (step back, be a mentor, or just be an ear for their frustrations).
What’s your rule of thumb on when you step back or intervene? I look forward to your thoughts via Twitter!
Note: For the source of Heike’s photo, head to this page.